
Agile MVP triangle: Fast, Good and Cheap
Last updated: July 23, 2024 Read in fullscreen view



- 02 Nov 2021
What is Terms of Reference (ToR)? 1093
- 01 Aug 2024
The Standish Group report 83.9% of IT projects partially or completely fail 923
- 18 Oct 2021
Key Elements to Ramping Up a Large Team 892
- 03 Apr 2022
Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF) 884
- 13 Apr 2024
Lessons on Teamwork and Leadership from Chinese story book "Journey to the West" 603
- 19 Oct 2021
Software development life cycles 598
- 20 Jul 2022
Software Myths and Realities 589
- 02 May 2022
What Is RAID in Project Management? (With Pros and Cons) 535
- 13 Jan 2020
Quiz: Test your understanding project cost management 498
- 28 Jul 2022
POC, Prototypes, Pilots and MVP: What's the differences? 477
- 14 Jun 2022
Example and Excel template of a RACI chart in Software Development 473
- 06 Mar 2021
4 things you need to do before getting an accurate quote for your software development 451
- 18 Dec 2023
The Cone of Uncertainty in Scrum & Requirement Definition 437
- 18 Jul 2021
How To Ramp Up An Offshore Software Development Team Quickly 417
- 01 Sep 2022
Facts Chart: Why Do Software Projects Fail? 416
- 12 Oct 2022
14 Common Reasons Software Projects Fail (And How To Avoid Them) 397
- 27 Jan 2020
Should a project manager push developers to work more hours due to mistakes of manager schedule setting? 389
- 16 Apr 2021
Insightful Business Technology Consulting at TIGO 330
- 13 Oct 2021
Outsourcing Software Development: MVP, Proof of Concept (POC) and Prototyping. Which is better? 317
- 28 Oct 2022
Build Operate Transfer (B.O.T) Model in Software Outsourcing 311
- 07 Jul 2021
The 5 Levels of IT Help Desk Support 304
- 12 Aug 2022
What is End-to-end project management? 303
- 07 Jul 2022
Managing Project Execution Terms 293
- 12 Dec 2021
Zero Sum Games Agile vs. Waterfall Project Management Methods 291
- 05 Mar 2021
How do you minimize risks when you outsource software development? 290
- 03 Jan 2023
Organizing your agile teams? Think about M.A.T (Mastery, Autonomy, Purpose) 289
- 17 Oct 2021
Does Fast Tracking increase project cost? 279
- 26 Sep 2024
Successful Project Management Techniques You Need to Look Out For 271
- 09 May 2022
Build one to throw away vs Second-system effect: What are differences? 250
- 06 Jun 2022
Change Management at the Project Level 230
- 22 May 2022
What are common mistakes that new or inexperienced managers make? 226
- 10 Apr 2024
The Parking Lot Method: Unlocking a Simple Secret to Supercharge Your Productivity 223
- 04 Oct 2021
Product Validation: The Key to Developing the Best Product Possible 218
- 15 May 2022
20 Common Mistakes Made by New or Inexperienced Project Managers 202
- 04 Oct 2022
Which ERP implementation strategy is right for your business? 202
- 10 Apr 2021
RFP vs POC: Why the proof of concept is replacing the request for proposal 201
- 01 May 2023
CTO Interview Questions 196
- 03 Nov 2022
Top questions and answers you must know before ask for software outsourcing 195
- 01 Aug 2022
Is planning "set it and forget it" or "set it and check it"? 189
- 31 Aug 2022
What are the best practices for software contract negotiations? 186
- 07 Aug 2022
Things to Consider When Choosing a Technology Partner 184
- 02 Dec 2021
3 Ways to Avoid Scope Creep in IT Consulting 163
- 09 Feb 2023
The Challenge of Fixed-Bid Software Projects 151
- 20 Nov 2022
Software Requirements Are A Communication Problem 150
- 07 Oct 2022
Digital Transformation: Become a Technology Powerhouse 148
- 02 Jun 2024
Reviving Ancient Wisdom: The Spiritual Side of Project Management 142
- 09 Mar 2022
Consultant Implementation Pricing 136
- 08 Nov 2022
4 tips for meeting tough deadlines when outsourcing projects to software vendor 134
- 01 Mar 2023
How do you deal with disputes and conflicts that may arise during a software consulting project? 129
- 05 Sep 2023
The Cold Start Problem: How to Start and Scale Network Effects 128
- 10 May 2022
Levels of Teamwork 126
- 01 Dec 2023
Laws of Project Management 125
- 01 May 2024
Warren Buffett’s Golden Rule for Digital Transformation: Avoiding Tech Overload 123
- 07 Dec 2023
12 project management myths to avoid 120
- 30 Nov 2023
Project Managers, Focus on Outcomes — Not Deliverables 119
- 09 Jan 2022
How to Bridge the Gap Between Business and IT? 115
- 16 Feb 2021
Choose Outsourcing for Your Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) 109
- 24 Nov 2023
The project management paradox: Achieving MORE by doing LESS 109
- 06 Mar 2024
[SemRush] What Are LSI Keywords & Why They Don‘t Matter 102
- 02 Nov 2022
Difference between Change Management and Project Management 100
- 21 Jun 2024
Dead Horses and the Escalation of Commitment 96
- 23 Jun 2024
Best Practices for Managing Project Escalations 88
- 05 Jun 2023
Fractional, Part-Time (virtual) or Interim CTO: Who Will Cover Your Business Needs? 81
- 01 Mar 2024
10 Project Management Myths 66
- 12 Aug 2024
Understanding Google Analytics in Mumbai: A Beginner's Guide 53
- 10 Jul 2025
Building AI-Driven Knowledge Graphs from Unstructured Data 46
- 17 Mar 2025
IT Consultants in Digital Transformation 39
Software engineers are all about managing tradeoffs. the highest level tradeoff is during planning and prioritization in the form of trading off value delivered, the quality level of that value, and the time to deliver it.
Under pressure from the market and their competitors, machine builders, but actually every system developer, are looking for ways to stretch and compress the ‘magic triangle’. In other words: deliver higher quality in a shorter time at a lower cost price. Money-time-quality are inextricably linked in this triangle.
Point of the triangle, you are explicitly giving up some focus on quality and a polished experience. you're also choosing to push out time to delivery somewhat to get more value in.
This is jokingly talked about as "fast, cheap, or good. pick two. no, not that one. " alternatively described as, "nine women cannot make a baby in one month" (mythical man month), meaning that even if you did add resources in the form of extra engineers, you can quickly get to a point of diminishing returns where adding people doesn't actually speed up the delivery.
Businesses know they need to set aside a budget to ensure they get an app that will meet or exceed these minimum expectations. We even created a calculator to help companies get a sense of how much they need to budget.
Although we take a transparent approach to pricing, timescales and project management when working with clients, we know not everyone in our industry does. Some web and app development firms charge considerably more. Others charge a lot less, aiming to rush through product development so they can move onto the next paying project.
Cost
This is basically scope. it could also be labeled "features," both in terms of breadth of different features, and the depth/scope of an individual feature. i thought about calling this "user value," but quality could also be considered to deliver user value. likewise, scope could include quality/polished work. in the end, this isn't a perfect term, but i basically mean user value excluding quality/polish.
When you pay too little for something that needs more investment to ensure you get the results you actually want. App and web development is a sector where bargains aren't always what they appear and trading between constraints is not always a good way to go. Web development firms that are up-front about costs, that show how/where that budget is going to be spent, are the ones that are worth working with.
Quality
Some examples of quality are high fidelity graphic style, ux optimizations based on feedback and performance tuning. this is often subjective and can take a virtually unlimited amount of time as you polish on the far end of the diminishing returns curve. the trick is getting to 80% of max quality with 20% of the effort.
Quality is a huge concern. If the end-result is an app you aren't happy with, it could take months to fix problems, or you might need to wait until you can work with a different firm to rebuild the app. Agencies that promise cheap and quick results often compromise on quality. Even if something looks nice - which is easier to achieve than ever thanks to templates - the user experience could let you down.
Time
This is simply the time to ship - to put the software in front of real users.
App development goes through several stages. From wireframe and designs, to iterative testing, creating the front and back-end, connecting the app to any databases, APIs or other services as needed, then quality testing, further iterations and changes, as needed.
Web development company that skip some of these steps, or take shortcuts to reduce timescales throughout the process aren't doing their clients any favors. You could end with an app full of bugs. An app your users or paying customers don't want to download and use. An app that receives bad reviews on app stores, making it far less likely that new potential users will download it.
Every app comes with its own production timescale. It depends on the number of features, estimated hours - which should be illustrated in a proposal - and time for a web development firm to work with a client, communicating needs and changes throughout the project. However, a quote seems too long or too short, it probably is. Reasonable quotes should reflect the total time to build, iterate, test, improve and complete an app. Not rushing a project for a quick finish, nor dragging the work out for months and months.
Good, fast, cheap: choose wisely!
Picking the right web development firm to work with shouldn't involve compromises. Select the one that delivers the work you need at the right price, with an emphasis on quality and realistic timescales. It's also useful to take a look at the clients they've worked with, how clients rate them, the reviews, and other indicators of their ability. Here at TIGO, we provide full-cycle development from initial concept to a live application. We have all IT specialists for hire – software engineers, designers, mobile developers, QA engineers and DevOps.
Our customers get exactly what they want by communicating with engineers directly and controlling the project as if they were in the same room with the team.