False Positives in Web Application Security and How to Handle Them
Last updated: November 03, 2025 Read in fullscreen view
Recommended for you
- 17 Jul 2023
What Is SSL? A Simple Explanation Even a 10-Year-Old Can Understand 44/122 - 05 Jul 2020 What is Sustaining Software Engineering? 39/1302
- 18 Oct 2020 How to use the "Knowns" and "Unknowns" technique to manage assumptions 38/1089
- 01 Mar 2023 What is Unit Testing? Pros and cons of Unit Testing? 29/439
- 01 Oct 2020 Fail fast, learn faster with Agile methodology 24/1047
- 13 Dec 2020 Move fast, fail fast, fail-safe 22/325
- 14 Oct 2021 Advantages and Disadvantages of Time and Material Contract (T&M) 22/865
- 20 Mar 2022 What is a Multi-Model Database? Pros and Cons? 21/1164
- 23 Oct 2024 The Achilles Heel of Secure Software: When “Best-in-Class” Security Still Leads to System Collapse 21/37
- 18 Aug 2022 What are the consequences of poor requirements with software development projects? 20/274
- 06 Feb 2021 Why fail fast and learn fast? 20/451
- 17 Mar 2025 Integrating Salesforce with Yardi: A Guide to Achieving Success in Real Estate Business 19/202
- 01 Mar 2023 Bug Prioritization - What are the 5 levels of priority? 18/236
- 23 Sep 2021 INFOGRAPHIC: Top 9 Software Outsourcing Mistakes 17/439
- 03 Jul 2022 What is the difference between Project Proposal and Software Requirements Specification (SRS) in software engineering? 17/1025
- 10 Nov 2022 Poor Code Indicators and How to Improve Your Code? 16/231
- 16 Mar 2023 10 Reasons to Choose a Best-of-Breed Tech Stack 16/221
- 31 Dec 2021 What is a Data Pipeline? 16/215
- 19 Sep 2025 The Paradoxes of Scrum Events: When You “Follow the Ritual” but Lose the Value 16/31
- 03 Jan 2026 The Hidden Rules of IT Project Tendering: Laws, Principles, and Caveats You Must Know 15/29
- 10 Apr 2022 What is predictive analytics? Why it matters? 15/192
- 19 Oct 2021 Is gold plating good or bad in project management? 15/816
- 25 Apr 2021 What is outstaffing? 14/270
- 30 Jan 2022 What Does a Sustaining Engineer Do? 14/617
- 19 Apr 2021 7 Most Common Time-Wasters For Software Development 14/556
- 22 Sep 2022 Why is it important to have a “single point of contact (SPoC)” on an IT project? 14/940
- 13 Nov 2021 What Is Bleeding Edge Technology? Are bleeding edge technologies cheaper? 13/539
- 08 Oct 2022 KPI - The New Leadership 12/603
- 31 Oct 2021 Tips to Fail Fast With Outsourcing 12/392
- 10 Dec 2023 Pain points of User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 11/452
- 24 Aug 2022 7 Ways to Improve Software Maintenance 11/306
- 01 Nov 2025 From Miracle to Mirage: The Truth Behind “Vibe Coding” 10/51
- 05 Jan 2024 Easy ASANA tips & tricks for you and your team 10/201
- 11 Jan 2024 What are the Benefits and Limitations of Augmented Intelligence? 10/478
- 17 Feb 2022 Prioritizing Software Requirements with Kano Analysis 10/304
- 28 Dec 2021 8 types of pricing models in software development outsourcing 10/437
- 12 Mar 2024 How do you create FOMO in software prospects? 9/167
- 13 Jan 2024 The “Rule of Law” in Software Projects: Engineering Principles That Govern Successful Development 8/21
- 06 Nov 2019 How to Access Software Project Size? 6/249
- 14 Mar 2024 Why should you opt for software localization from a professional agency? 6/140
- 26 Dec 2023 Improving Meeting Effectiveness Through the Six Thinking Hats 6/254
The term “false positive” refers to a false alarm, similar to your home alarm going off when there’s no intruder. In web application security, a false positive occurs when a web application security scanner detects a vulnerability on your website—such as an SQL Injection—but in reality, no such issue exists.
Web security experts and penetration testers (PenTesters) use automated web application security scanners to streamline the penetration testing process, ensuring that all attack surfaces of a web application are checked quickly and correctly. However, as noted above, automated tools can also cause certain issues.
Web Application Security Becomes Unaffordable Due to False Positives
Web application security scanners are known to generate false positives. As a result, web application penetration tests can become very time-consuming because PenTesters must manually verify all reported vulnerabilities by attempting to exploit them. Due to this lengthy process, many businesses cannot afford comprehensive web security. However, cost is not the only problem caused by false positives.
Ignoring Real Web Security Vulnerabilities
It is human nature to quickly disregard errors that appear insignificant. PenTesters may do the same during a web application penetration test. For example, if a web security scanner detects 200 cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities and the first 20 variants are false positives, a PenTester might assume that all remaining variants are also false positives and ignore them. Consequently, actual web application vulnerabilities may go undetected.
Lack of Knowledge Leads to Many False Positives in Scan Reports
When a PenTester must manually verify the scanner’s findings, the quality of the results depends largely on the tester’s knowledge rather than the capabilities of the web application security scanner. A tester’s expertise is usually measured by years of in-depth study and experience. As we have seen, since PenTesters often do not fully trust automated scanners, they verify every web vulnerability reported by the tool.
If a user lacks the knowledge or experience to exploit a specific web application vulnerability detected by the scanner, that vulnerability is considered a false positive and may never be fixed.
Web Application Security Scanners vs. PenTesters
Business owners and security managers often face a dilemma: should they invest in a web application security scanner that can be used by their own staff, or hire a professional PenTester? And if they invest in a scanner, do they have employees qualified to verify the results?
It is important to note that a web application security scanner can never fully replace a PenTester, but PenTesters alone cannot achieve the speed and efficiency of automated tools. In a web penetration test, both software and human expertise are essential. Through automation and modern technology, much of the process can be automated, reducing the need for human intervention in PenTesting.
Proof-Based Scanning Technology
The most effective and cost-efficient solution is a web application security scanner with Proof-Based Scanning technology. This type of scanner can automatically verify its findings by exploiting identified vulnerabilities and providing proof of exploitation to the user. Such scanners offer multiple benefits: security testing takes much less time, and staff do not need extensive hacking experience to verify results.
Netsparker was the first web application security scanner on the market with this exploitation capability. Additionally, the exploitation is safe and read-only, so there is no risk of data loss or disruption to website services. With this type of automated, self-verifying technology, businesses can reduce web security program costs while improving the security of all their web assets.
Explore more on these topics
Guest Blogging: The Definitive Guide
Top Trending Topics
Share This
Link copied!
Recently Updated News