How to Reduce Friction Between Product and Engineering Teams?
Last updated: August 05, 2025 Read in fullscreen view
Recommended for you
- 19 Oct 2021
Software development life cycles 614 - 21 Jun 2022 Difference between Quality and Grade 585
- 28 Jul 2022 POC, Prototypes, Pilots and MVP: What's the differences? 523
- 21 Sep 2023 Abraham Wald and the Missing Bullet Holes 494
- 18 Jul 2021 How To Ramp Up An Offshore Software Development Team Quickly 454
- 12 Oct 2022 14 Common Reasons Software Projects Fail (And How To Avoid Them) 444
- 19 Jul 2022 The 12 Principles of Continuous Process Improvement 390
- 13 Oct 2021 Outsourcing Software Development: MVP, Proof of Concept (POC) and Prototyping. Which is better? 384
- 29 Nov 2021 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Partnership Agreements 359
- 28 Oct 2022 Build Operate Transfer (B.O.T) Model in Software Outsourcing 340
- 12 Dec 2021 Zero Sum Games Agile vs. Waterfall Project Management Methods 335
- 17 Jun 2021 What is IT-business alignment? 318
- 05 Mar 2021 How do you minimize risks when you outsource software development? 305
- 26 Sep 2024 Successful Project Management Techniques You Need to Look Out For 304
- 04 Oct 2021 Product Validation: The Key to Developing the Best Product Possible 280
- 20 Dec 2021 What is Hybrid Mobile App Development? 247
- 04 Oct 2022 Which ERP implementation strategy is right for your business? 242
- 11 Jan 2022 Lean Thinking and Lean Transformation 228
- 05 Aug 2024 Debunking 10 Myths About Change Management 214
- 02 Oct 2022 [Medium] The Importance of Being Able to Pivot 199
- 11 Jul 2022 Lean software development - the game-changer in the digital age 197
- 01 Dec 2023 Laws of Project Management 195
- 31 Aug 2022 What are the best practices for software contract negotiations? 194
- 01 May 2024 Warren Buffett’s Golden Rule for Digital Transformation: Avoiding Tech Overload 165
- 12 Sep 2024 Be Water, My Friend: Fluidity, Flow & Going With the Flow 146
- 05 Sep 2023 The Cold Start Problem: How to Start and Scale Network Effects 140
- 09 Sep 2024 How AI Rewriting Can Improve Your Content’s SEO Performance 131
- 07 Nov 2022 Why Design Thinking can save the outsourcing industry 128
- 06 Mar 2024 [SemRush] What Are LSI Keywords & Why They Don‘t Matter 111
- 06 Dec 2024 Steps For Integrating Sustainable Practices Into Business Operations 89
- 12 Aug 2024 Understanding Google Analytics in Mumbai: A Beginner's Guide 70
- 04 Apr 2025 To Act or Not to Act – A Manager’s Persistent Dilemma 33
- 15 Aug 2025 Quantum Technology: Global Challenges and Opportunities for Innovators 33
We often hear that delivery slows down, estimates lose accuracy, and the team starts circling around the same problems without closure. Basically, it happens because of friction between product and engineering.
Let us guide how to reduce such friction before it turns into stalled execution, fragmented ownership, and fading trust on both sides.
What Does Friction Between Product and Engineering Really Mean?
Look closely and check: is there a sudden drop in momentum, a clash in sprint priorities, or multiple rewrites tied to the same feature ticket? If the answer lands on yes, friction exists between product and engineering.
But what exactly does friction represent? Friction means both sides move, but without harmony. It emerges through patterns such as:
- Shifting goals without concrete closure
- Trade-offs decided in silos
- Project energy misdirected
- Shared vocabulary is absent during meetings
- Ownership is scattered across decision points
So pause and ask again. If feature delivery starts to feel like a tug-of-war, if estimates come padded with frustration, if retros sound repetitive—then yes, the friction is real and it demands attention.
Why Friction Happens Between Product and Engineering?
- Product chases outcomes like user adoption or revenue spikes, so a rushed feature release often feels like a win—until engineering faces cascading bugs from skipped edge cases.
- Engineering safeguards system health and long-term scalability, yet their hesitations often seem like blockers when the product demands a quick market push.
- A sprint begins with clear boundaries, but as new feedback trickles in mid-cycle, the feature grows silently while timelines remain untouched.
- The product assumes that tech will “figure it out,” but without clear trade-off discussions, engineering ends up rewriting components under pressure.
- Reactive loops dominate planning cycles, so product responds to sudden feedback, while engineering scrambles to retrofit code not built for fast pivots.
- Decision-making spreads across too many roles, so ownership gets diluted, and critical rollouts stall without a single accountable voice.
- Shared terms like “MVP” or “launch-ready” float freely, but without alignment, both teams walk away thinking very different things are complete.
So, How to Reduce the Friction Between Product and Engineering Teams?
First of all, you need to see who's responsible for reducing friction at each side. Leadership must create the conditions, but teams must hold the line daily. Clear ownership must exist across both product and engineering. If the weight falls only on one end, the imbalance turns into resentment. Shared accountability prevents that.
So, you need to start with a clear roadmap as it must carry both urgency and feasibility. The product team must anchor decisions in customer signals, while engineering must shape them into durable solutions. You need to ensure that everything is aligned right away, as roadmap planning should hold both voices in equal strength.
Next, you need to establish working rituals that reduce confusion. For instance, you can hold two structured syncs every week between product and engineering leads. Each meeting can help address trade-offs, validate shifts, and mark decision points. After each sync, publish short action items, so there are no silent assumptions.
It is also important to unify the tools. Use a single project board for both teams. Track blockers. Review tickets. Log feedback. Place design handoffs, customer insights, and technical limits in visible tools like Figma, Miro, or Confluence. Even a whiteboard photo from a sync can hold key points. It’s best to use an image to text and turn that into searchable content everyone can use.
Then, you must bring discipline to the collaboration language. Replace abstract updates with framed information. Product teams must explain the ‘why’ behind user needs. Engineering teams must explain the ‘how’ behind solution limits. Each explanation must stay grounded in data, not opinion.
You may also create joint visibility into outcomes, so both teams can track the same OKRs. Use shared metrics like cycle time, feature adoption, and defect ratios. You’ll see how this shapes a common view of success and prevents misplaced expectations.
Finally, you need to introduce short-term role exposure. For instance, you can encourage product managers to attend debugging sessions or let engineers join customer calls. Because role immersion grows empathy faster than any briefing and experience teaches alignment in ways words cannot.
Is “Healthy Tension” a Myth?
Various modern tech organizations use the phrase “healthy tension” as a safety valve. Leaders often claim it keeps teams sharp, fuels innovation, and balances business needs with technical depth. But if you dissect real-time day-to-day dynamics, you’ll see a different aspect.
So, does this tension truly remain healthy—or does it quietly erode the alignment between product and engineering teams?
Hubert Palan, CEO of Productboard, argued in the Engineering Leadership Podcast (Ep. 149) that the best engineering collaborators are the ones who bring business context into the conversation. According to him, when engineers link technical recommendations to competitive strategy, the “tension” doesn’t disappear—it evolves into shared ownership. However, this shift occurs only when both sides trust that their inputs have an influence on the outcomes.
Vinay Patel from OIC Advisors challenges the blanket framing of tension as “healthy.” In his article, Product Management Vs. Engineering: Can’t We All Just Get Along? (2025), he writes that “healthy tension” becomes a myth the moment feedback loops break and incentives diverge. What starts as a dynamic balance quickly devolves into side-channel decisions, misaligned deliverables, and finger-pointing across leadership reviews.
Similarly, Thoughtworks’ scale-up framework (Rick Kick & Kennedy Collins, 2023) warned against glorifying “tension” unless teams invest in deliberate collaboration models. Their take is clear: realignment must involve role clarity, stream-aligned teams, and joint accountability rituals. Otherwise, leaders end up romanticising the very dysfunctions they should be correcting.
So what’s the verdict? “Healthy tension” only stays healthy under three conditions:
- Shared incentives and language anchor decision-making.
- Clear ownership boundaries stop problems from bouncing between teams.
- Frequent strategy syncs allow both sides to speak from the same map, not from parallel tracks.
Otherwise, tension hardens into a cultural rift. It creates silos disguised as expertise. And no matter how talented your PMs or engineers are, misalignment always costs velocity, morale, and ultimately, product value.
Bottom Line
Friction always shows up where product pushes outcomes and engineering guards feasibility. Progress stays smooth only if both sides stay clear, aligned, and accountable. Otherwise, trust fades and momentum breaks.
Explore more on these topics
Guest Blogging: The Definitive Guide
Top Trending Topics
Share This
Recently Updated News
