How To Hold People Accountable for Portfolio Decision-making When Things are Uncertain?
Last updated: December 25, 2025 Read in fullscreen view
- 18 Oct 2020
How to use the "Knowns" and "Unknowns" technique to manage assumptions 38/1089 - 03 Dec 2025
Templafy Features Explained: The Ultimate Guide to Streamlined Content Management 33/59 - 01 Sep 2022
Facts Chart: Why Do Software Projects Fail? 29/596 - 29 Nov 2021
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Partnership Agreements 28/544 - 01 Oct 2020
Fail fast, learn faster with Agile methodology 24/1047 - 14 Oct 2021
Advantages and Disadvantages of Time and Material Contract (T&M) 22/864 - 13 Dec 2020
Move fast, fail fast, fail-safe 20/323 - 18 Aug 2022
What are the consequences of poor requirements with software development projects? 20/274 - 06 Feb 2021
Why fail fast and learn fast? 19/450 - 16 Apr 2021
Insightful Business Technology Consulting at TIGO 18/412 - 03 Dec 2025
IT Outsourcing Solutions Explained: What, How, Why, When 18/40 - 26 Dec 2025
The Machiavelli Paradox: Why Ethical Leaders Sometimes Lose - and What Businesses Must Learn 18/51 - 23 Sep 2021
INFOGRAPHIC: Top 9 Software Outsourcing Mistakes 17/439 - 10 Nov 2022
Poor Code Indicators and How to Improve Your Code? 16/231 - 28 Oct 2025
The Future of Real Estate: Key Trends and Essential Lessons in Digital Transformation 16/60 - 01 Mar 2023
Bug Prioritization - What are the 5 levels of priority? 16/234 - 08 May 2024
Time Unlocked: Mastering the Pomodoro Technique Against Parkinson's Law 15/235 - 19 Oct 2021
Is gold plating good or bad in project management? 15/816 - 07 Aug 2022
Things to Consider When Choosing a Technology Partner 14/283 - 08 Nov 2022
4 tips for meeting tough deadlines when outsourcing projects to software vendor 14/291 - 19 Apr 2021
7 Most Common Time-Wasters For Software Development 14/556 - 20 Dec 2021
What is Hybrid Mobile App Development? 14/378 - 10 Jul 2025
Building AI-Driven Knowledge Graphs from Unstructured Data 14/162 - 07 Jul 2021
The 5 Levels of IT Help Desk Support 13/448 - 07 Nov 2022
Why Design Thinking can save the outsourcing industry 12/194 - 08 Oct 2022
KPI - The New Leadership 12/602 - 31 Oct 2021
Tips to Fail Fast With Outsourcing 12/392 - 10 Apr 2021
RFP vs POC: Why the proof of concept is replacing the request for proposal 12/322 - 22 May 2025
Role of Self-Service in CRM: Customer & Partner Portals for Automation 12/90 - 16 Feb 2021
Choose Outsourcing for Your Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) 11/173 - 10 Dec 2023
Pain points of User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 11/452 - 06 Mar 2021
4 things you need to do before getting an accurate quote for your software development 11/679 - 28 Dec 2021
8 types of pricing models in software development outsourcing 10/437 - 03 Nov 2022
Top questions and answers you must know before ask for software outsourcing 10/291 - 17 Feb 2022
Prioritizing Software Requirements with Kano Analysis 10/304 - 05 Jan 2024
Easy ASANA tips & tricks for you and your team 9/200 - 11 Jan 2024
What are the Benefits and Limitations of Augmented Intelligence? 9/477 - 12 Mar 2024
How do you create FOMO in software prospects? 9/167 - 05 Sep 2024
The Inverted Approach: A Guide to Identifying Software Risks with Reverse Brainstorming 9/255 - 06 Dec 2024
Steps For Integrating Sustainable Practices Into Business Operations 8/142 - 09 Jan 2022
How to Bridge the Gap Between Business and IT? 8/178 - 09 Mar 2022
Consultant Implementation Pricing 8/213 - 01 Mar 2023
How do you deal with disputes and conflicts that may arise during a software consulting project? 7/165 - 16 Dec 2025
12 UNWRITTEN LAWS OF LIFE & WORK 7/25 - 14 Mar 2024
Why should you opt for software localization from a professional agency? 6/140 - 07 Oct 2022
Digital Transformation: Become a Technology Powerhouse 6/244 - 06 Nov 2019
How to Access Software Project Size? 6/249 - 30 Oct 2022
How Much Does MVP Development Cost in 2023? 5/240 - 09 Feb 2023
The Challenge of Fixed-Bid Software Projects 5/213 - 20 Nov 2022
Software Requirements Are A Communication Problem 5/244 - 26 Dec 2023
Improving Meeting Effectiveness Through the Six Thinking Hats 5/253 - 01 May 2023
CTO Interview Questions 5/329 - 15 Aug 2025
Quantum Technology: Global Challenges and Opportunities for Innovators 4/100 - 19 Apr 2024
What is Skills-Based Approach & Why Does it Matter? 3/134 - 17 Mar 2025
IT Consultants in Digital Transformation 2/83
Most organizations don’t lack innovation ideas - they lack a clear way to place them where they belong. Why do some projects keep getting funded despite delivering little value? Why are potentially game-changing ideas often downsized in the name of “safety”?
In this article, we explore the Bread & Butter – Oysters – Pearls – White Elephants matrix as a practical lens for managing innovation portfolios. You’ll see the critical difference between projects that sustain today and those that shape tomorrow - and the common management traps that quietly kill breakthrough innovation.
As we go deeper, the article uses clear screenshots of the risk-versus-reward matrix to visualize each project type, decision logic, and accountability model - all aligned with the mindset of “keep it simple, but significant” to help you streamline your business, not complicate it.
The Bread & Butter – Oysters – Pearls – White Elephants Matrix
In innovation management, the greatest challenge is not a lack of ideas, but how resources and accountability are allocated when the future of a project is inherently uncertain.
Not all projects carry the same level of risk, value, or strategic importance-therefore, they should not be managed or evaluated using a single, uniform approach.
The Bread and Butter – Oysters – Pearls – White Elephants matrix was created to address this problem.
Its purpose is to classify R&D and New Product Development initiatives based on probability of success and value if successful, enabling organizations to apply the right management logic to the right type of project.
1. Why Innovation Projects Must Be Classified
Research and development projects operate in conditions of:
- Technological uncertainty
- Market uncertainty
- Cost and time uncertainty
When all projects are evaluated using traditional criteria such as:
- On-time delivery
- Staying within budget
- Meeting the original plan
…the result is often:
- High-risk projects being downsized to appear “safe”
- Managers avoiding breakthrough initiatives
- Organizations optimizing the present while sacrificing the future
This four-quadrant matrix helps organizations recognize the fundamental differences between project types, instead of forcing all innovation efforts into the same evaluation framework.
2. Bread and Butter: Sustaining the Present
Characteristics
- High probability of success
- Low to moderate value if successful
- Typically includes product improvements, cost reductions, and process optimization
Role
- Supports the company’s short-term health
- Ensures operational stability and predictable returns
Appropriate Management Approach
- Delivered on time
- Within budget
- Meets clearly defined objectives
➡️ These projects are well suited to traditional management and KPI-based accountability.
3. Oysters: Investing in the Future
Characteristics
- Low probability of success
- Very high value if successful
- Often involves new technologies, new business models, or disruptive offerings
Role
- Forms the foundation of long-term competitive advantage
- Creates future growth opportunities
Common Management Pitfall
When managed like Bread and Butter projects, organizations tend to:
- Reduce project scope to improve certainty
- Turn Oysters into “safe but insignificant” initiatives
- Discourage managers from taking on high-risk projects altogether
More Effective Accountability
- Fail early and fail cheaply: discover failure as soon and as inexpensively as possible
- Actively adjust scope versus probability of success
- Continuously align decisions with long-term strategic objectives, not just short-term KPIs
➡️ Accountability here is not about guaranteeing success, but about making sound decisions under uncertainty.
4. Pearls: When Risk Has Been De-Risked
Characteristics
- High probability of success
- High value if successful
- Often Oysters that have passed their most critical uncertainty thresholds
Role
- Bridges breakthrough innovation and commercialization
- Drives sustainable growth
Management Approach
- Can follow Bread and Butter-style discipline
-
But must avoid:
- Unrealistic expectations
- Excessive pressure that distorts the project’s value
➡️ Pearls require execution discipline, but also room to fully realize their potential.
5. White Elephants: Drains on Resources
Characteristics
- Low probability of success
- Low value even if successful
-
Often persist due to:
- Historical decisions
- Internal politics
- Long-standing but flawed assumptions
Problem
- Consume scarce resources
- Contribute little to either short-term performance or long-term strategy
Rational Management Response
- Reassess the true value of the project
- Be willing to terminate early
- Or restructure to meaningfully increase potential value
➡️ Good management is not just about execution-it is also about knowing when to stop.
6. The Human Dimension: Managing Failure
One of the biggest barriers to innovation is not technical complexity, but organizational psychology.
If:
- Failure is always equated with incompetence
- Participation in risky projects is never recognized
…then no one will volunteer for Oysters-the very projects that shape the company’s future.
A mature organization must:
- Distinguish between poor decision-making and failure caused by uncertainty
- Recognize and reward sound judgment, even when outcomes are negative
7. Final Thoughts
The Bread and Butter – Oysters – Pearls – White Elephants matrix is not a cosmetic classification tool for reports.
It is a decision-making framework for accountability in uncertain environments.
but because organizations apply the wrong management logic to the wrong type of project.
Understanding this matrix enables organizations to:
- Protect the present
- Cultivate the future










Link copied!
Recently Updated News