
Production-Ready vs Feature-Complete: What’s the Difference?
Last updated: June 20, 2024 Read in fullscreen view



- 10 Apr 2022
Difference Between Forward and Backward Reasoning in AI 1232
- 02 May 2022
Difference between CapEx vs. OpEx: Two Ways to Finance Your Software Project 1208
- 17 Oct 2022
What is the difference between low-end, mid-end and high-end solutions of project management software? 1041
- 20 Jan 2022
Difference between Bug, Defect, Error, Fault & Failure 941
- 07 Dec 2021
What's the difference between soft freeze, hard freeze and customization freeze? 936
- 05 Jul 2020
What is Sustaining Software Engineering? 901
- 20 Mar 2022
What is a Multi-Model Database? Pros and Cons? 822
- 03 Jul 2022
What is the difference between Project Proposal and Software Requirements Specification (SRS) in software engineering? 765
- 01 Oct 2020
Fail fast, learn faster with Agile methodology 755
- 03 Aug 2022
What Are OLAs? SLAs vs OLAs vs UCs: What’s The Difference? 699
- 22 Sep 2022
Why is it important to have a “single point of contact (SPoC)” on an IT project? 673
- 14 Oct 2021
Advantages and Disadvantages of Time and Material Contract (T&M) 636
- 18 Oct 2020
How to use the "Knowns" and "Unknowns" technique to manage assumptions 598
- 19 Oct 2021
Is gold plating good or bad in project management? 578
- 21 Jun 2022
Difference between Quality and Grade 526
- 08 Oct 2022
KPI - The New Leadership 486
- 01 Feb 2022
Outstaffing Vs. Outsourcing: What’s The Difference? 470
- 30 Jan 2022
What Does a Sustaining Engineer Do? 390
- 10 Nov 2021
PoC vs. Prototype vs. MVP: What’s the difference? 358
- 24 Nov 2021
What is the difference between off-the-shelf software and customized software? 352
- 23 Sep 2021
INFOGRAPHIC: Top 9 Software Outsourcing Mistakes 324
- 13 Nov 2021
What Is Bleeding Edge Technology? Are bleeding edge technologies cheaper? 317
- 05 May 2022
DAM vs. CMS: What's the difference? 297
- 11 Jan 2024
What are the Benefits and Limitations of Augmented Intelligence? 295
- 10 Dec 2023
Pain points of User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 290
- 28 Dec 2021
8 types of pricing models in software development outsourcing 286
- 02 Nov 2021
Difference between an ESTIMATE and a QUOTE 270
- 19 Apr 2021
7 Most Common Time-Wasters For Software Development 265
- 31 Oct 2021
Tips to Fail Fast With Outsourcing 259
- 13 Dec 2020
Move fast, fail fast, fail-safe 253
- 01 Mar 2023
What is Unit Testing? Pros and cons of Unit Testing? 249
- 06 Feb 2021
Why fail fast and learn fast? 232
- 01 Apr 2022
Dedicated Team vs. Extended Team: What’s the difference? 222
- 25 Jan 2022
What is the difference between Outsourcing and Outstaffing? 204
- 18 Aug 2022
What are the consequences of poor requirements with software development projects? 201
- 06 Nov 2019
How to Access Software Project Size? 200
- 25 Apr 2021
What is outstaffing? 194
- 15 Sep 2022
CRM vs CDP: What's the difference? 193
- 18 Mar 2022
Difference between Project Management and Management Consulting 186
- 10 Nov 2022
Poor Code Indicators and How to Improve Your Code? 178
- 26 Dec 2023
Improving Meeting Effectiveness Through the Six Thinking Hats 158
- 09 Dec 2021
Customer Service vs Technical Support: What’s The Difference? 155
- 31 Dec 2021
What is a Data Pipeline? 155
- 17 Feb 2022
Prioritizing Software Requirements with Kano Analysis 153
- 01 Mar 2023
Bug Prioritization - What are the 5 levels of priority? 148
- 10 Apr 2022
What is predictive analytics? Why it matters? 145
- 06 Jun 2024
Software Upgrade vs Software Update: What is the difference? 142
- 05 Jan 2024
Easy ASANA tips & tricks for you and your team 105
- 12 Mar 2024
How do you create FOMO in software prospects? 79
- 14 Mar 2024
Why should you opt for software localization from a professional agency? 64
The Lifecycle of a Software Project
The lifecycle of a project begins with some sort of “discovery” process, where the software team works with the product owner to clarify their definitions of success, and gain an understanding of business priorities for the product owner. The outcome of this phase is often a list of project deliverables (features) and an estimate of the time that it will take to complete the project.
Fast forward, and the features are grouped into releases, which constitute useful functional groupings. For instance, a first release might include core workflow features around user account creation and management, as well as a few of the most important features of the proposed product. Over several releases, the project will reach a state where the client feels it is providing the value they desire. At this point, it will be transitioned to some sort of support and maintenance mode.
These two phases are ubiquitous in all software projects regardless of development style, but what differs greatly across development styles is the timing or cadence with which these phases are executed. The Agile development methodology (practiced at Very), states that these phases should happen frequently and in an iterative fashion. Iteration is a key component of Agile Development, and in order to iterate, something must exist in the first place (we’ll come back to this).
Feature-Complete
For a piece of software to be considered “feature-complete,” it has all of its planned or primary features implemented but isn’t yet “final” due to bugs, stability or performance issues. On the surface, this seems reasonable, but in reality, it is ambiguous and subjective. This is rooted in the subject of the definition – “piece of software.” How “big” is this piece of software? How many features? How many man-hours?
As the piece of software gets bigger, becoming “feature-complete” becomes a daunting task. Simply receiving a sign-off of “feature-completeness” may take weeks or months. The bugs and other issues that need resolution in order to push past feature-complete may be overwhelming. Worst of all – what if the team has spent so long focusing on checking off all the “planned or primary features,” that they are no longer relevant to the end goal of the project?
On the other hand, if the size of the “piece of software” is relatively small, most of the aforementioned problems vanish. If we focus the assessment of “feature-completeness” on small releases, we can easily check off the boxes, squash bugs quickly, and plan the next release with knowledge gained from the previous one. This allows for painless removal or modification of features as we learn more about their relevance to the overall project goals.
Production-Ready
A piece of software is considered production-ready if it is capable of meeting the demands of its users. This includes ease of usability, reliability, and availability. Various software teams assess these criteria in different ways, but Agile teams lean on acceptance of user stories in order to validate usability, and automated testing to validate reliability. The last piece, availability, means that the software must be available to use (e.g. it must be in production). Agile teams maximize availability by leveraging automated deployments and practicing continuous delivery.
Similar to the conundrum of “feature-complete,” assessing whether or not a piece of software is “production-ready” greatly depends on the size of that piece of software. If we make the assessment on a small piece of software (i.e. a small release), it is easy to perform. This means that it can be quickly deployed, and provide immediate value. Subsequent releases can be evaluated in the same way, ensuring every part of the software system is production-ready with minimal delay for QA/QC/Testing/etc.
What to Do With This New Information
People invest in a custom software development project because they believe it will bring them some positive return on their investment. Therefore, we should seek to take actions that will maximize the likelihood that a software project will yield a positive return. Some things that you can take away from the previous discussions are:
- Software cannot yield returns unless it is available in production, and these returns will likely be higher if the software is usable and reliable.
- Our knowledge of which features yield the highest return can evolve dramatically as users interact with software in production.
With this in mind, very’s official recommendation is: “Focus on small, production-ready releases. Only assess feature-completeness within the context of each release. Embrace change in feature scope as you learn which features are most valuable.”