The Paradoxes of Scrum Events: When You “Follow the Ritual” but Lose the Value
Last updated: January 17, 2026 Read in fullscreen view
Recommended for you
- 01 Aug 2024
The Standish Group report 83.9% of IT projects partially or completely fail 339/2059 - 13 Apr 2024 Lessons on Teamwork and Leadership from Chinese story book "Journey to the West" 81/1085
- 02 Nov 2021 What is Terms of Reference (ToR)? 47/1566
- 03 Apr 2022 Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF) 29/1274
- 15 Jan 2026 ITIL vs PMP: What’s the Difference and Which One Should You Choose? 25/34
- 21 Nov 2025 The Pressure of Short-Term Funding on Small-Budget IT Projects 25/35
- 18 Dec 2025 AI: Act Now or Wait Until You’re “Ready”? 22/42
- 25 Sep 2018 Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Multi-Stakeholder Communication in IT Projects 21/28
- 23 Oct 2024 The Achilles Heel of Secure Software: When “Best-in-Class” Security Still Leads to System Collapse 21/37
- 12 Jan 2026 Why YouTube Content Is the New Resume: Building Trust and Expertise Even Without Views 20/33
- 18 Dec 2023 The Cone of Uncertainty in Scrum & Requirement Definition 17/701
- 12 Aug 2022 What is End-to-end project management? 15/444
- 26 Sep 2024 Successful Project Management Techniques You Need to Look Out For 14/401
- 10 Apr 2024 The Parking Lot Method: Unlocking a Simple Secret to Supercharge Your Productivity 14/481
- 05 Jun 2023 Fractional, Part-Time (virtual) or Interim CTO: Who Will Cover Your Business Needs? 14/148
- 18 Oct 2021 Key Elements to Ramping Up a Large Team 13/1198
- 07 Jul 2022 Managing Project Execution Terms 12/411
- 23 Jun 2024 Best Practices for Managing Project Escalations 11/207
- 24 Nov 2023 The project management paradox: Achieving MORE by doing LESS 10/219
- 06 Jun 2022 Change Management at the Project Level 10/309
- 02 May 2022 What Is RAID in Project Management? (With Pros and Cons) 10/813
- 13 Jan 2020 Quiz: Test your understanding project cost management 10/609
- 20 Jul 2022 Software Myths and Realities 10/891
- 14 Jun 2022 Example and Excel template of a RACI chart in Software Development 10/804
- 02 Dec 2021 3 Ways to Avoid Scope Creep in IT Consulting 9/207
- 22 May 2022 What are common mistakes that new or inexperienced managers make? 9/286
- 02 Nov 2022 Difference between Change Management and Project Management 9/232
- 03 Jul 2022 Occam’s Razor and the Art of Software Design 9/505
- 07 Dec 2023 12 project management myths to avoid 8/189
- 07 Sep 2022 The Adaptive Scrum: Why Modified Agile Model? 8/322
- 09 Sep 2022 Debunking 50+ Agile Scrum Interview Questions 8/436
- 15 May 2022 20 Common Mistakes Made by New or Inexperienced Project Managers 8/281
- 27 Jan 2020 Should a project manager push developers to work more hours due to mistakes of manager schedule setting? 8/434
- 09 May 2022 Build one to throw away vs Second-system effect: What are differences? 8/316
- 10 May 2022 Levels of Teamwork 6/197
- 03 Jan 2023 Organizing your agile teams? Think about M.A.T (Mastery, Autonomy, Purpose) 6/375
- 30 Nov 2023 Project Managers, Focus on Outcomes — Not Deliverables 6/160
- 17 Oct 2021 Does Fast Tracking increase project cost? 6/368
- 06 Sep 2021 Scrum Flexibility: Navigating the Boundaries of Agile Modification 6/320
- 01 Mar 2024 10 Project Management Myths 5/143
- 12 Apr 2025 How to Ask Powerful Questions Like Socrates 5/34
- 21 Jun 2024 Dead Horses and the Escalation of Commitment 3/139
- 01 Aug 2022 Is planning "set it and forget it" or "set it and check it"? 3/277
- 02 Jun 2024 Reviving Ancient Wisdom: The Spiritual Side of Project Management 3/233
- 06 Mar 2024 Most Common Software Development Methodologies 2/158
- 18 Feb 2026 "Hit and Run" Project Management: Balancing Speed with Sustainability 2/7
Scrum is designed to be simple, transparent, and adaptive. Yet in real-world implementations, many teams paradoxically drift further away from Agile values the more strictly they follow Scrum events.
This is the hidden reality of Scrum: doing Scrum correctly does not always mean getting value from Scrum.
1. Sprint Planning: Planning to Defend the Plan
Original purpose:
To align the team around a clear Sprint Goal-what to build and why it matters.
Common paradox:
- Sprint Planning turns into detailed task breakdowns and hour-by-hour estimates
- Teams overload the sprint to appear productive
- Sprint Goals become vague or ceremonial
Result: The team becomes rigid and stressed when change occurs-ironically, the very problem Scrum was created to solve.
→The more detailed the plan, the less adaptable the team.
2. Daily Scrum: Reporting Instead of Collaborating
Original purpose:
To help Developers inspect progress and adapt the daily plan toward the Sprint Goal.
Common paradox:
- Daily Scrum becomes a status report to the Scrum Master or manager
- Team members speak mechanically: “Yesterday I did…, today I will…”
- Little real listening or coordination happens
Result: Problems remain unresolved even though “the meeting was held.”
→ The more consistent the Daily Scrum, the weaker the collaboration-if the intent is misunderstood.
3. Sprint Review: Performing Instead of Learning
Original purpose:
To inspect the Increment and gather real feedback from stakeholders.
Common paradox:
- Sprint Review turns into a polished demo
- Teams avoid showing unfinished or problematic work
- Stakeholders provide shallow or passive feedback
Result: The product continues in the wrong direction while the team believes the sprint was successful.
→The harder you try to prove success, the slower you discover failure.
4. Sprint Retrospective: Talking More, Changing Less
Original purpose:
To continuously improve people, processes, and ways of working.
Common paradox:
- The same issues resurface sprint after sprint
- Action items are vague, optional, or ownerless
- Retrospectives become emotional venting sessions
Result: The Retro becomes therapy instead of a performance improvement mechanism.
→ The more retrospectives you run, the more the team accepts the status quo.
5. Time-boxing: Respecting Time, Not Value
Original purpose:
To create focus and prevent endless discussions.
Common paradox:
- Meetings end on time but produce little value
- Decisions are postponed “to save time”
- Scrum is followed by the book, yet outcomes remain empty
Result: Teams respect the clock more than the purpose of the event.
Why Do These Paradoxes Exist?
- Scrum is treated as a process, not a framework
- Pressure from KPIs, reporting, and micromanagement
- Lack of empirical thinking (transparency, inspection, adaptation)
- Scrum Masters focused on rule enforcement rather than change leadership
How to Break the Scrum Event Paradox
- Always return to the question:
“What problem does this event exist to solve?” - Measure Scrum events by value created, not rule compliance
- Allow flexibility in facilitation as long as the purpose is preserved
- Optimize for outcomes, not just outputs
Conclusion
Scrum events are not mandatory meetings to “do Scrum right.”
They are learning and adaptation tools.
When teams stop questioning how and why they run Scrum events, Scrum loses its meaning.
Teams do Scrum every day-but no longer think Agile.
Explore more on these topics
Guest Blogging: The Definitive Guide
Top Trending Topics
Share This
Link copied!
Recently Updated News