Scrum Flexibility: Navigating the Boundaries of Agile Modification
Last updated: December 20, 2025 Read in fullscreen view
- 01 Aug 2024
The Standish Group report 83.9% of IT projects partially or completely fail 630/2419 - 13 Apr 2024
Lessons on Teamwork and Leadership from Chinese story book "Journey to the West" 140/1204 - 01 Dec 2022
Difference between Set-based development and Point-based development 109/464 - 19 Oct 2021
Software development life cycles 105/782 - 21 May 2022
"Fail Fast, Fail Often, Fail Forward" is the answer to Agile practices of software success 102/1141 - 02 Nov 2021
What is Terms of Reference (ToR)? 102/1663 - 13 Oct 2021
Outsourcing Software Development: MVP, Proof of Concept (POC) and Prototyping. Which is better? 97/566 - 10 Apr 2022
Agile self-organizing teams: What are they? How do they work? 96/617 - 18 Oct 2020
How to use the "Knowns" and "Unknowns" technique to manage assumptions 93/1181 - 03 Jul 2022
Manifesto for Agile Software Development 93/360 - 13 Dec 2020
Move fast, fail fast, fail-safe 90/404 - 12 Oct 2022
14 Common Reasons Software Projects Fail (And How To Avoid Them) 86/646 - 11 Jan 2024
What are the Benefits and Limitations of Augmented Intelligence? 86/562 - 27 Oct 2020
8 principles of Agile Testing 84/1392 - 06 Feb 2021
Why fail fast and learn fast? 82/543 - 23 Jun 2024
Best Practices for Managing Project Escalations 79/282 - 16 Jul 2022
What are disadvantages of Agile Methodology? How to mitigate the disadvantages ? 79/465 - 14 Mar 2024
Why should you opt for software localization from a professional agency? 78/217 - 03 Apr 2022
Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF) 77/1389 - 23 Sep 2021
INFOGRAPHIC: Top 9 Software Outsourcing Mistakes 76/499 - 01 Oct 2020
Fail fast, learn faster with Agile methodology 76/1140 - 04 Oct 2021
Product Validation: The Key to Developing the Best Product Possible 76/383 - 31 Aug 2022
What are the best practices for software contract negotiations? 75/341 - 28 Nov 2023
Scrum Team Failure — Scrum Anti-Patterns Taxonomy 73/324 - 20 Nov 2022
Agile working method in software and football 71/410 - 12 Aug 2024
Understanding Google Analytics in Mumbai: A Beginner's Guide 71/165 - 18 Aug 2022
What are the consequences of poor requirements with software development projects? 67/324 - 03 Jan 2023
Organizing your agile teams? Think about M.A.T (Mastery, Autonomy, Purpose) 67/460 - 02 May 2022
What Is RAID in Project Management? (With Pros and Cons) 65/895 - 01 Jun 2022
How Your Agile Development Team is Just Like a Football Team? 65/283 - 06 Mar 2024
[SemRush] What Are LSI Keywords & Why They Don‘t Matter 65/258 - 01 Mar 2024
10 Project Management Myths 63/214 - 05 Mar 2021
How do you minimize risks when you outsource software development? 63/390 - 12 Aug 2022
What is End-to-end project management? 62/525 - 05 Sep 2023
The Cold Start Problem: How to Start and Scale Network Effects 62/253 - 07 Oct 2025
Case Study: Using the “Messaging House” Framework to Build a Digital Transformation Roadmap 61/139 - 07 Oct 2020
How To Manage Expectations at Work (and Why It's Important) 60/386 - 14 Oct 2021
Advantages and Disadvantages of Time and Material Contract (T&M) 56/932 - 08 Oct 2022
KPI - The New Leadership 55/660 - 07 Jul 2022
Managing Project Execution Terms 54/461 - 04 Mar 2023
[Medium] Box-Ticking: The Management Strategy That’s Killing your Productivity 54/701 - 01 May 2024
Warren Buffett’s Golden Rule for Digital Transformation: Avoiding Tech Overload 53/259 - 02 Nov 2022
Difference between Change Management and Project Management 53/283 - 28 Dec 2021
8 types of pricing models in software development outsourcing 52/486 - 12 Dec 2021
Zero Sum Games Agile vs. Waterfall Project Management Methods 51/461 - 10 Dec 2023
Pain points of User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 51/504 - 28 Jul 2022
POC, Prototypes, Pilots and MVP: What Are the Differences? 51/776 - 22 May 2025
Role of Self-Service in CRM: Customer & Partner Portals for Automation 51/132 - 09 Sep 2022
Debunking 50+ Agile Scrum Interview Questions 50/489 - 17 Dec 2025
Unaligned Escalation Logic: A Silent Risk in Complex Organizations 50/72 - 14 Jun 2022
Example and Excel template of a RACI chart in Software Development 50/906 - 09 May 2022
Build one to throw away vs Second-system effect: What are differences? 50/361 - 27 Jan 2020
Should a project manager push developers to work more hours due to mistakes of manager schedule setting? 49/485 - 07 Sep 2022
The Adaptive Scrum: Why Modified Agile Model? 49/395 - 17 Oct 2021
Does Fast Tracking increase project cost? 48/418 - 09 Oct 2022
Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Agile Methodology 48/751 - 18 Dec 2023
The Cone of Uncertainty in Scrum & Requirement Definition 48/769 - 01 Dec 2023
Laws of Project Management 48/360 - 10 Apr 2024
The Parking Lot Method: Unlocking a Simple Secret to Supercharge Your Productivity 47/546 - 01 Mar 2023
Bug Prioritization - What are the 5 levels of priority? 46/271 - 22 May 2022
What are common mistakes that new or inexperienced managers make? 46/326 - 04 Oct 2022
Which ERP implementation strategy is right for your business? 44/378 - 12 Mar 2024
How do you create FOMO in software prospects? 44/212 - 24 Nov 2023
The project management paradox: Achieving MORE by doing LESS 44/273 - 19 Apr 2021
7 Most Common Time-Wasters For Software Development 44/589 - 12 Oct 2020
The Agile Manifesto - Principle #8 44/537 - 19 Oct 2021
Is gold plating good or bad in project management? 43/873 - 05 Jun 2023
Fractional, Part-Time (virtual) or Interim CTO: Who Will Cover Your Business Needs? 42/183 - 18 Oct 2021
Key Elements to Ramping Up a Large Team 41/1279 - 18 Jul 2021
How To Ramp Up An Offshore Software Development Team Quickly 41/627 - 02 Dec 2021
3 Ways to Avoid Scope Creep in IT Consulting 41/250 - 07 Dec 2023
12 project management myths to avoid 39/231 - 05 Jan 2024
Easy ASANA tips & tricks for you and your team 39/234 - 28 Oct 2022
Build Operate Transfer (B.O.T) Model in Software Outsourcing 39/439 - 13 Jan 2020
Quiz: Test your understanding project cost management 39/671 - 26 Sep 2024
Successful Project Management Techniques You Need to Look Out For 38/432 - 17 Feb 2022
Prioritizing Software Requirements with Kano Analysis 37/341 - 06 Jun 2022
Change Management at the Project Level 37/342 - 20 Jul 2022
Software Myths and Realities 36/960 - 30 Nov 2023
Project Managers, Focus on Outcomes — Not Deliverables 36/196 - 10 Nov 2022
Poor Code Indicators and How to Improve Your Code? 36/253 - 26 Dec 2023
Improving Meeting Effectiveness Through the Six Thinking Hats 35/303 - 02 Jun 2024
Reviving Ancient Wisdom: The Spiritual Side of Project Management 35/281 - 18 Feb 2026
"Hit and Run" Project Management: Balancing Speed with Sustainability 35/48 - 01 Mar 2022
Why Does Scrum Fail in Large Companies? 34/297 - 31 Oct 2021
Tips to Fail Fast With Outsourcing 34/420 - 15 Aug 2025
Quantum Technology: Global Challenges and Opportunities for Innovators 33/152 - 21 Oct 2022
Virtual meeting - How does TIGO save cost, reduce complexity and improve quality by remote communication? 32/216 - 10 Oct 2022
Should Your Business Go Agile? (Infographic) 31/155 - 02 Nov 2022
Frequently Asked Questions about Agile and Scrum 31/428 - 15 May 2022
20 Common Mistakes Made by New or Inexperienced Project Managers 30/311 - 01 Aug 2022
Is planning "set it and forget it" or "set it and check it"? 29/315 - 21 Jun 2024
Dead Horses and the Escalation of Commitment 27/164 - 10 May 2022
Levels of Teamwork 23/217 - 06 Nov 2019
How to Access Software Project Size? 23/275
The Scrum model is very well defined. It works for a reason. Many have modeled it for us before. Any modification you make you are risking doing Scrum half way or being in a what I call Scrum-isch scenario in which case you may miss the actual benefits of Scrum.
However every team has different, unique needs. Start out by integrating the process as clean as possible, do it by the book, and do it for a while. Then observe and listen to feedback from the team.
Ask yourself: What is the person/team struggling with, and why? What are the underlying causes?
Be selective about what modifications you are considering to make. It's typical for people to object to new processes and structure in general, so you will have to separate the standard complaints about the process overall, stand by the argument of why it is useful to keep the process clean and investigate the generic “the process does not work” comments for the actual underlying cause. If you do that, and you still find that there are indeed some minor nuances of the process that could be changed based on recommendations without impacting the larger structure, then by all means do it.
The problem with Scrum is that it is so perfectly pre defined, that people have done it for so long now and know it works, that it leaves no space for a team to be part of the creation process any more. It seems as if you are forcing people into a process they had no say in. Of course it is that way for a reason. Can you imagine the chaos if we created our own process based on everyone's wants and needs? It makes sense for process oriented people to see the benefits of a template, but psychologically it does not work for everyone. Some team members always want to feel that they have a say in what their every day work structure looks like.
Modifications of meeting days/times should always be an option for the team to decide on as a whole. Meeting length for sprint kick ofs is another one that can be modified. Initially you will need 4 hours, but over time as you become more efficient with the team, perhaps there is an opportunity to change it. If you end early often, this is a good indicator that you are ready to reduce the meeting time. I wouldn’t recommend going below 2 hours for kickoff meetings or else you are prone to rush through your items and don’t allow the time needed to drill into the stories deep enough. Overall the message should be that the time invested in the Scrum meetings is time well spent.
Ask the team what format they want to follow for the retrospective? Shall the group use a spreadsheet for tracking of action items or just talk free form in the rounds about how the sprint went?
Can we please sit down in stand ups? I know - it couldn't be more obvious than calling a meeting a "stand up" - however I get asked this all the time. So, I passed the question back to the team. If the majority would want to sit I feel we could compromise on this, even though there are clear benefits to standing. So far it hasn't been the majority who want to go this route, only one or two. So we stand. At least we asked.
How to track velocity may not be something you easily want to change since it takes several sprints to accumulate an average velocity in either metric and is an important artifact to plan and measure on a company level.
When making changes, keep in mind that anything can be a trial. Agree to try something new, just the tiniest thing and then change it again if it doesn’t work. Discuss at retrospectives. With that you are applying one of the top Agile principles of “inspect and adapt” to the process and are modeling what you are teaching.
Remain open and listen. Rather than having to refer back to Scrum rules and use the "this is how it is" expression, in my experience it is better to let the team come to their own realizations of the benefits of the structure of the process as it is. And sometimes that can only happen if you change it.
| About the Author | Judith Basler, MBA | Program & Project Management |
Program & Project Management | Design OPS | Responsible Innovation | Trust & Safety | Social Impact | Learning Experience Designer | Facebook Alum
I am a creative operations leader with many years of experience supporting product development teams in various sectors. I spent the last 4.5 years at Meta working in Integrity and Responsible Innovation, instating company wide principles and furthering the understanding of how to produce products that are more ethical and inclusive. Once I started focusing on Product Ethics I never could look back, everything I do I view under the lens of product equity, trust and safety. I am convinced that educating people and developing an operations process that is inclusive of responsible innovation checkpoints can fundamentally enhance the positive impact a product has on society and minimize the negative consequences. I am excited for the opportunity to partner with anyone who wants to put actionable changes in place.
|










Link copied!
Recently Updated News